Monday, 26 March 2012

The three D's. Deficit, Dominance and Difference. Who do I agree with? Robin Lakoff, Zimmerman & West or Deborah Tannen?



Robin Lakoff believes that women use many techniques in their speech that are deficient to men's speech. These include, fillers, hedges, intensifiers, hypercorrect grammar and tag questions.
Although I do agree that women use these techniques I feel that they're not necessarily making women deficient to men. 
Take intensifiers for example, if someone says 'This bread is very tasty' and another says 'This bread is tasty', does one person sound weaker than the other? I'd say no. One person is going in to more detail about the bread and although the sentences are nearly the same, the sentence that uses 'very' is more interesting and shows more feelings towards the taste. 
I believe tag questions are another thing that isn’t necessarily deficient in the way a female speaks also, I think tag questions are used to involve the other person into the conversation that they are having, and I believe they are used to be polite.

Zimmerman & West's dominance theory is similar to Robin Lakoff's deficit theory but focus' on the way men speak instead of women. They say men dominate a conversation by using more interruptions, this, according to Zimmerman & West, is a sign of dominance over women. I’d say though, that this is a sign of rudeness, and makes them deficient in something such as a job interview as a conversation is supposed to bounce back and forward and if it doesn’t people feel uncomfortable.

Deborah Tannen’s difference theory is the theory I most agree with. Men and women are certainly different in their speech but I think dependant on the situation either can be more dominant or deficient.
Deborah Tannen also says that women talk more about feelings and men more facts, I definitely agree with this due to noticing this in real life,  I don’t know whether I’d believe this was due to nature or nurture though.
Another reason I believe Deborah Tannen’s theory the most is due to the study she took, it was a lot more recent and a lot more people took part so the study was definitely more reliable than Zimmerman & West and Robin Lakoff’s studies which took part in 1975.